0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: OFOTD on October 12, 2005, 03:23:03 PMRemember that the 2GB file limitation is a result of FAT32 file system and not something that can be changed via a firmware update. All a firmware update can do is split the files before they reach th 2GB mark or something of that nature. But having a single file over 2GB isn't gonna happen.
Quote from: spyder9 on October 12, 2005, 03:29:19 PMQuote from: OFOTD on October 12, 2005, 03:23:03 PMRemember that the 2GB file limitation is a result of FAT32 file system and not something that can be changed via a firmware update. All a firmware update can do is split the files before they reach th 2GB mark or something of that nature. But having a single file over 2GB isn't gonna happen.Hmmm. Good answer OFOTD. So what you're saying is MT has no chance of eliminating the 2GB split? So they do need to pattern it after the 722 and make the split seamless.Is Fat32 a Microsoft thingy?
Quote from: spyder9 on October 12, 2005, 03:31:54 PMI wonder, with the new OS next year, if Microsoft is going to improve the file system for stuff like this.
Quote from: martin on October 12, 2005, 03:37:03 PMQuote from: spyder9 on October 12, 2005, 03:31:54 PMI wonder, with the new OS next year, if Microsoft is going to improve the file system for stuff like this. They were. WinFS (Windows File System) but have since dropped that for the time being due to holding up development.NTFS and all your worries are gone....and so is multiple OS/cross platform support. Someone mentioned NTFS has licensing restrictions, could be another reason no one uses it?Sure would be cool to have the option to format to NTFS in the MicroTrack in a firmware update. Hint Hint!
Quote from: spyder9 on October 12, 2005, 03:21:29 PMWhat is the purpose of the 2GB limit for either the 722 or the MT? Over-heating from manufacturing test failures past the 2 GB continous record? Seriously, can someone answer that question? Maybe a safety valve for possible unit failure during a long recording? Save-as-you go feature? Nice if your ENG, but as a taper, that would make me nervy, even if the split & restart was seamless.
Quote from: nickgregory on October 12, 2005, 03:51:17 PMQuote from: spyder9 on October 12, 2005, 03:21:29 PMWhat is the purpose of the 2GB limit for either the 722 or the MT? Over-heating from manufacturing test failures past the 2 GB continous record? Seriously, can someone answer that question? Maybe a safety valve for possible unit failure during a long recording? Save-as-you go feature? Nice if your ENG, but as a taper, that would make me nervy, even if the split & restart was seamless.the purpose of the split is so that you can manage whatever size files you want. I think you can set it all the way down to .5Gb to a max of 4 Gb....pretty convenient based on the speed of the PC you work with. As for making me nervous, thankfully it works fine (outside of one bad firmare update that caused a looping problem)...
Quote from: spyder9 on October 12, 2005, 03:46:09 PMYou hit the nail on the head. If they developed WinFS to replace NTFS, then Microsoft could release the licensing restrictions on NTFS, like they did with Fat32. Sh$t, c'mon Billy, get WinFS going! Your messing with our recordings!
Quote from: martin on October 12, 2005, 04:02:36 PMDrifting off topic, but 2GB is a software limit put in place. The 722 will do 4GB wav files and must split there due to FAT32 limitations. NTFS has no limit unless you are talking in the terabyte range.