Hi,
My application is to record voice (interview-type setup) with decent enough fidelity to analyse the speech. Not for acoustic analysis per se (not that good), but just so that I can play it back and listen to bits of it over and over again to make distinctions between slight variations in vowels, etc.
I guess what I need is good "range" for the human voice. I wanted to use a clip-on lav, or actually two (one for me, one for the interviewee).
I bought a cheap one at Radio Shack made by "Nexxtech" and it is horrible. I'm just posting it here because it pertains to the bundled mic that comes with the Microtrack.
The cheap lav I got sounds horribly muffled, tinny, distant compared to the "free" T mic that came with the unit. That thing sounds great to my ears (a little more self-noise, but much better, fuller sound and more range). It's good for voice at least.
The way I tested it is by holding the recorder about as far away from my mouth as a clip-on lav would be. In that situation it still sounded infinitely better.
So my question is -- is this a lavalier vs T-mic thing? Or am I just using really HORRIBLE lavs?
I am considering an Audio Technica AT831b cardioid lav -- but it's expensive, and still I would either need two, or I'd need to use a crappy radio shack lav for the interviewer's voice.
Is cardioid the way to go for clip-ons?