0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Church-Audio on May 17, 2006, 09:04:41 PMGood thing mine are not as confirmed by my audiologist. And by wearing ear plugs when I was just teching a sound system and not mixing. But I guess there are stereotypes no mater where you go. I am amazed how many people make negative comments towards me when all I am asking for is a fair trial but no one seems to be able to set it up Chris ChurchQuote from: wericB on May 17, 2006, 07:46:54 PMI find that *most* who have been in the music/audio industry for twenty+ years have ears that are shot.. ymmv
Quote from: wericB on May 17, 2006, 07:46:54 PMI find that *most* who have been in the music/audio industry for twenty+ years have ears that are shot.. ymmv
Quote from: Church-Audio on May 17, 2006, 09:45:02 PMHi this is a stupid question I know but why not just unplug on cable after the recording is made and then plug the other one in and record that cable that way you can't say that capacitance was a factor by using a splitter? Let me know if that was a dumb ass question ok Chris ChurchQuote from: SparkE! on May 17, 2006, 09:37:59 PMQuote from: willndmb on May 17, 2006, 08:04:22 PMon my shit speakers source 2 sounds bestfollowed by 1 and then 3so if i understand right, source 2 would have both burned in on l/r1 would have 1 burnt in one not3 would have both not burnt itHey thanks for taking the time to listen, but I don't think you understand how the test was set up.These are 3 different stereo sources, each made with 2 cables, 1 on one channel and 1 on the other channel. One cable is burned in, the other is not. On 2 of the 3 sources, the burned in cable is on one channel and on 1 of the 3 sources, the burned-in cable is on the other channel. The goal is to pick which recording has the cables on different channels with respect to the other 2.Unfortunately, people are responding more to the fact that these are 3 different sources, so that is unfairly biasing the results. Please try again when I post 3 recordings of the same source and try to pick which 2 of the 3 are recorded with the same cable. Extra credit for identifying whether those 2 recordings were made with the burned-in cable or the new cable.Right now, I'm having a hard time finding my two identical splitters so that all signal paths will be identical, except for the choice of cable connected to the recorder. I don't want two different types of splitters involved too.
Quote from: SparkE! on May 17, 2006, 09:37:59 PMQuote from: willndmb on May 17, 2006, 08:04:22 PMon my shit speakers source 2 sounds bestfollowed by 1 and then 3so if i understand right, source 2 would have both burned in on l/r1 would have 1 burnt in one not3 would have both not burnt itHey thanks for taking the time to listen, but I don't think you understand how the test was set up.These are 3 different stereo sources, each made with 2 cables, 1 on one channel and 1 on the other channel. One cable is burned in, the other is not. On 2 of the 3 sources, the burned in cable is on one channel and on 1 of the 3 sources, the burned-in cable is on the other channel. The goal is to pick which recording has the cables on different channels with respect to the other 2.Unfortunately, people are responding more to the fact that these are 3 different sources, so that is unfairly biasing the results. Please try again when I post 3 recordings of the same source and try to pick which 2 of the 3 are recorded with the same cable. Extra credit for identifying whether those 2 recordings were made with the burned-in cable or the new cable.Right now, I'm having a hard time finding my two identical splitters so that all signal paths will be identical, except for the choice of cable connected to the recorder. I don't want two different types of splitters involved too.
Quote from: willndmb on May 17, 2006, 08:04:22 PMon my shit speakers source 2 sounds bestfollowed by 1 and then 3so if i understand right, source 2 would have both burned in on l/r1 would have 1 burnt in one not3 would have both not burnt it
Quote from: Church-Audio on May 17, 2006, 09:45:18 AMAs for my knowledge well lets just say I have been doing "audio" for 20 years and in that time worked with some of the most advanced audio gear on the planet.
Quote from: Crabcakechris s sent me to try sounded different to my humble ears compared to the canares i run on a daily basis, chris shepard is a standup guy and anyone who says different is an idiot...
Quote from: Church-Audio on May 18, 2006, 01:03:48 AMI would say CD player into recorder via "magic cables" keep the signal path simple what do you think? Chris Church
Quote from: Teddy on May 18, 2006, 09:03:37 AMChris is just a cynic(like myself and others). That in and of itself is not a crime. He is a good man. He even started using puncutation, give him a break.
Quote from: Dipshit on May 18, 2006, 09:03:37 AMNoone has said any different, so what is your point exactly?? .
Quote from: Teddy on May 18, 2006, 12:20:52 PMchris shepard is a standup guy and anyone who says different is an idiotso you didnt say the above?? and does that comment imply that someone insulted him personally?
Quote from: jcrab66 on May 18, 2006, 12:18:39 PMQuote from: Teddy on May 18, 2006, 09:03:37 AMChris is just a cynic(like myself and others). That in and of itself is not a crime. He is a good man. He even started using puncutation, give him a break. never said anything bad about him myselfQuote from: Dipshit on May 18, 2006, 09:03:37 AMNoone has said any different, so what is your point exactly?? .i made a comment regarding the fact that i could tell the difference between my cheap canares and some higher end cables, much like many have in this thread. Thats my point. A better question might be what was the point of your question???
Quote from: SparkE! on May 18, 2006, 12:10:55 PMQuote from: Church-Audio on May 18, 2006, 01:03:48 AMI would say CD player into recorder via "magic cables" keep the signal path simple what do you think? Chris Church How about we use a 24 bit source? Does anyone know of something on the Archive that would make good use of the whole audio spectrum and would be listenable to a wide range of people? Maybe one of Skalinder's recordings? Maybe one of Wayne Brissette's? Teddy, maybe one of yours?
Quote from: Teddy on May 18, 2006, 03:12:31 PMI will gladly submit something.Im in MD right now for an audition, but I will hook you up on Monday when I return.Quote from: SparkE! on May 18, 2006, 12:10:55 PMQuote from: Church-Audio on May 18, 2006, 01:03:48 AMI would say CD player into recorder via "magic cables" keep the signal path simple what do you think? Chris Church How about we use a 24 bit source? Does anyone know of something on the Archive that would make good use of the whole audio spectrum and would be listenable to a wide range of people? Maybe one of Skalinder's recordings? Maybe one of Wayne Brissette's? Teddy, maybe one of yours?
Quote from: Church-Audio on May 18, 2006, 06:11:27 PMif you want to use my lack of proper English against me go right aheadI guess thats the way it goes when you lose an argument you need to find some fault in me don't you? Quote from: Moke on May 18, 2006, 05:37:26 PMedit, in an attempt to resemble the english language.
Quote from: Moke on May 18, 2006, 05:37:26 PMedit, in an attempt to resemble the english language.
Quote from: Moke on May 18, 2006, 08:22:55 PMwhat are your thoughts on current bunching and the skin effect?