I expereinced some distortion with my mke2's and I would not be suprised if my AT943's will distort in high SPL situations. They are both 2-wire.
Should I get someone to do the 4.7k mod or should I consider doing the 3-wire set-up? With the 3-wire I would need a new preamp and I would also need new extention cables for running on a stand. With the 4.7k mod im not sure it would work with the mke2's. Im kinda bumbed out. I do not know the best route of action here.
I guess I could just use my mke40's in high SPL situations and use the AT's and mke2's when the SPL's are lower. Although, I would like to get rid of the SPL variable when chosing what set of mics to run.
Windorabug: here's what I'm currently doing. I do tape some shows at a local club that are more of the "acoustic" variety, i.e. even though it's coming through a PA, I just can't get great levels running AT mics > 3wire bbox > iriver/Edirol recorder (R-1/R-09). So, thanks to Richard's aid, I'm building a dual miniXLR > mini-plug cable; thereby running the mics using 2-wire bbox powering. This will, of course, increase the output level of the mics (better levels for softer music, which wouldn't distort anyway). This way, I can use the *same* pair of mics for louder, or softer shows... and, it's much cheaper than buying a 3-wire preamp.
To me, the 3-wire "mod" on the mics (with miniXLR connectors) seems to offer the most variety, i.e. with the 4.7k mod, you're stuck with the lower levels and choosing a preamp if you want to use the mics for lower sound (or amplifying the crap out of the WAV file in post). But with the miniXLR connectors for 3-wire powering, you can still "go back" to 2-wire powering as needed, using one of these cables. Yes, the cables cost a little bit (it's the miniXLR connectors that constitute the bulk of the cost)... but like I said, it offers a variety of options and at a more minimal cost than a preamp.