1) Simplicity of use
2) Build and expected durability
3) Sound as a one box solution--particularly in the realms of comparable recording such as 24/96 which I could actually do something with in terms of my current editing/sharing capacities.
4) For MR1000, is the DSD sound really that different than 24/96 and above PCM?
5) For non professional but serious hobbyist is SD722 overkill? Is MR1000 too new and too gimmicky to have staying power as a product?
6) What would you buy with your hard earned $ given price/performance ratio?
Thanks in advance for advice
Welcome aboard. I am slightly biased on my opinion, however everything I have read (and seen) leads me to the following...
1. Either will win this one. They are both easy to use. The 722 might have a slight advantage when it comes to size.
2. 722. No doubt that this unit performs in extreme weather/harsh conditions and is built rock solid.
3. 722. Very nice pres and a really nice A>D. I think the Korg pre's are very sensitive and not the greatest out of the box, but good nonetheless.
4. DSD is a nice upgrade to PCM audio. However, there are not too many options with playback and mastering of DSD. You have to rely on Korg's software to do the DSD > PCM conversion. Not a deal breaker, but just something else to think about.
5. No way, IMO! The 722 is expensive, but you get piece of mind. It is a pro unit used on mission critical projects.
6. Only thing I would have done differently than buying a 722, would have been buying a 744t!
I would love a MR1000 myself, but I am going to wait until there are more flavors and playback/mastering options. I am perfectly happy with recording 24/96 for the time being.