Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)  (Read 3829 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KLowe

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
  • CrossFit....check you ego at the door
MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« on: December 04, 2007, 05:07:17 PM »
Hey team,
What is the general concensus for general live taping purposes of the MK4 card -vs- the mk5 card?

I know the mk5 has a "presence bump" but does this bump affect live recording adversly?  advantageously?

Are the MK5's considered good for live PA taping?

Thanks,

KLowe  (considering the dark side)
I actually work for a living with music, instead of you jerk offs who wish they did.

bwaaaahahahahahaha.... that is awesome!

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2007, 05:13:31 PM »
I like the bump in the mk5 - it's all a matter of taste really.

Taping from a distance that little bump could be advantageous.

They're not in heavy use but plenty of folks I know have them or have owned them
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18872
  • Gender: Male
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2007, 05:42:44 PM »
I've used both.  The MK5s are a bit brighter than the MK4s, which I like.  (Then again, the MK4Vs are also brighter than the MK4s, and I don't like them.  Whether it's because of the more abrupt bump, or because they're less directional at higher frequencies, I'm not sure.)  I really only think the MK5s are worth the extra cash if you also want and will use the omnis.  I think both the MK4 and MK5 sound great, but my ears give an edge to the MK5s.  I've only used the omnis sparingly, but really like them when in the right situation - usually on-stage or unamplified performances - either with a small split or better yet a j-disc.

At any rate, I think all three - MK4, MK5, MK4V - are suitable for a variety of recording situations.  Just depends on your preference, whether you want the omni option, etc.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2007, 01:33:06 PM »
KLowe  (considering the dark side)

Thinking of moving from Neumanns...say it ain't so!

Offline KLowe

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
  • CrossFit....check you ego at the door
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2007, 01:40:08 PM »
Moving from.......NEVER!!!

just possibly adding to the slut locker....
I actually work for a living with music, instead of you jerk offs who wish they did.

bwaaaahahahahahaha.... that is awesome!

Offline PH

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • can you fix it in the mix?
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2007, 01:44:06 PM »
I have both and they sound virtually identical. What Brian said is right, if you plan on using the omni's then go with the 5's. If not, I wouldn't bother with the extra cash.
In the 5 years I have owned my CCM5's, I have run them in omni maybe 10-15 times. Usually onstage or split at a festival.

I have found the 4's to be REALLY flat and usually need just touch of brightness applied in post.
The 5's are usually just about right without any eq. I prefer the brighter sound from the 5's, but you
can achieve virtually the same thing with 4's by applying a small eq bump around 5k.

CCM!

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40703
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2007, 11:33:41 AM »
I too have ALWAYS liked the mk5's better than the mk4's......
Schoeps MK 4V's & MK 41V's & 250|0 KCY's ->
Naiant +60v & +48v Low Noise PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

https://archive.org/details/@diskobean
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline KLowe

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
  • CrossFit....check you ego at the door
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2007, 12:29:57 PM »
I too have ALWAYS liked the mk5's better than the mk4's......

sweeeet.  I'll get to find out how they sound on monday  >:D
I actually work for a living with music, instead of you jerk offs who wish they did.

bwaaaahahahahahaha.... that is awesome!

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40703
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: MK 5 opinions? (vs MK 4)
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2007, 01:38:54 PM »
I too have ALWAYS liked the mk5's better than the mk4's......

sweeeet.  I'll get to find out how they sound on monday  >:D

Let us know 8)
Schoeps MK 4V's & MK 41V's & 250|0 KCY's ->
Naiant +60v & +48v Low Noise PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

https://archive.org/details/@diskobean
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 33 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF