Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: line in or mic in that is the question!  (Read 4573 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicegrin

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 192
line in or mic in that is the question!
« on: December 31, 2007, 11:04:30 PM »
I know this subject has been touched before, but I want to hear more opinions about it...

The question is should one use line in or mic in when recording with an edirol r09 + a batterybox?

The standard answer seem to be line in for moderately to loud shows and mic in otherwise...

But...

Some days ago i recorded a pretty loud rock concert with Edirol r09 + bb box + sony ecm 717.
Then there was another show afterwards (also RNR) that i recorded. For the first gig i used line in, for the second gig i used mic in.

I much more prefer the sound i had from mic in than line in. Sounds more "present" in some way... Hm... Hard to describe soundimage with words but I kind of got a "warmer" sound with mic in even though i set the levels to pretty much the same. Atleast that is my impression.

Normally i use other mics (hlsc-1) so i need to try to record also some shows with them using both line in and mic in for comparison reasons. But since I recorded a pretty loud rock concert with the ecm 717 mic in without brickwalling I guess the HLSCs will not have any problem either when used with mic in... Or am i missing something in my way of reasoning here?

What are your experiances? What are the pros and cons of using line in and mic in? Is there any reason why i should not use mic in except for the possibility of brickwalling?

Thanx!



Toy Box:

MICS:

Omnis:  6xNevaton MCE400s, Countryman b3s (modded), MM HLSOs (4.7K mod), Aevox in ear MK2s, CA-11s
Cards:   Schoeps MK4s with Schoeps CMRS, Milab VM-44 Links, SP CMC-8,  AT853, Sennheiser MKE 104, MM HLSC-1s, ECM-717
Hypers: AKG CK93s (modded), SP CMC-8, AT853, Audix 1280s (Church actives).


INBETWEEN: Naiant Tinybox (CMR mod), Naiant Tinybox (p48 mod), Naiant PFA, CA-9100, CA Ugly, Denecke PS-2 mini, MM-MBM, MM-CBM, SP SPSB-8, custom nuetrik XLR to TRS cables, 5 pin to 5 pin extension cable. 

DECKS: A10, M10, R05, Tascam DR-05, R09-HR , MT2, Sharp MS-H702, MZ-R 70.

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2008, 12:42:59 AM »
I've used mic-in (due to busted line-in jack) with no problems.  I've found that the mic-in runs 8dB hotter than the line-in.

DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2008, 04:08:25 AM »
Your Sony ecm-719 is a low-sensitivity mic.
Actually the only mic I could use on MIC-in with my old MD-recorders at loud rock shows.

That´s why you should use mic-in on your R09 with THIS particular mic.

Using high-sensitive mics, LINE-IN is the way to go for loud rock-shows as the output of the mic coming into the R09 is much higher compared to your Sony ecm-719.

I would choose plug-in power activated on the R09 and remove the sony-ecm-719 internal battery.
 ::)

« Last Edit: January 01, 2008, 04:10:03 AM by Arni99 »
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline nicegrin

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 192
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2008, 04:10:30 PM »
so an additional question.  If you are recording mic in or line in - 8 db (this corresponds to 8 steps on the edirol right?) you are suppose to get the same results? true?
Or is there also a difference in soundimage between line in and mic in, that' s what i would like to know...

Thanx!
Toy Box:

MICS:

Omnis:  6xNevaton MCE400s, Countryman b3s (modded), MM HLSOs (4.7K mod), Aevox in ear MK2s, CA-11s
Cards:   Schoeps MK4s with Schoeps CMRS, Milab VM-44 Links, SP CMC-8,  AT853, Sennheiser MKE 104, MM HLSC-1s, ECM-717
Hypers: AKG CK93s (modded), SP CMC-8, AT853, Audix 1280s (Church actives).


INBETWEEN: Naiant Tinybox (CMR mod), Naiant Tinybox (p48 mod), Naiant PFA, CA-9100, CA Ugly, Denecke PS-2 mini, MM-MBM, MM-CBM, SP SPSB-8, custom nuetrik XLR to TRS cables, 5 pin to 5 pin extension cable. 

DECKS: A10, M10, R05, Tascam DR-05, R09-HR , MT2, Sharp MS-H702, MZ-R 70.

Offline tms

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
  • Gender: Male
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2008, 11:19:58 AM »
Wow, I've been wondering that too.  Glad to see you heard a difference, I'll have to try it and see which is better to my ears too. 

Mines a little different b/c there would be an extention cord in the mix, the SP AT-853 mics don't have a very long cord.  Not sure which is better, mics>ext cord>mic-in R-09 or mics>SPSB-1>line-in R-09?
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Ben Franklin

SP-CMC-4 (AT853) > SP battery box > Edirol R-09

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2008, 09:36:53 PM »
Not sure which is better, mics>ext cord>mic-in R-09 or mics>SPSB-1>line-in R-09?

You'll want to go mics > SPSB-1 > mic-in if you use it.  Disable the plug-in power using the R-09's menu.  You'll get better powering for the mics using the battery box.

Did my last show mics > SPSB-6 > R-09 mic-in (plug-in power off, lo-cut off).
DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

Offline Per

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 57
  • Gender: Male
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2008, 07:30:17 AM »
taped slayer in june with mk4 > nbox > r-09 . I was going line in on the r-09, but then the inevitable happened. The line input broke (as on many r-09 decks it seems). I noticed it and was forced to switch to mic input. The result was a crunching overloading bass (even though the levels were not up to 0db/clipping). I think the mic input overloaded.
DPA4061 > MPS6030 > Edirol R-09/M1/D100(Oade mod)
Schoeps MK4 / MK41 > Nbox > Edirol R-09/M1/D100(Oade mod)

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2008, 01:43:40 PM »
I think the mic input overloaded.

It very well may have.  I don't know about your specific nbox, but I've seen them listed as providing 17-20dB gain, which may have caused the overloading.
DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

Offline nicegrin

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 192
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2008, 03:46:31 PM »
someone wrote here that he found out that the mic-in adds another 8 db compared to line in. Does this mean that the optimal levels on the edirol should be -8 notches compared with the perfect levels when using line in, regardless what the levelindicators show on the edirol while recording mic in?
If so you might want to use mic in but peaking at -8 db at most?  Anyone who did some experiments?

Toy Box:

MICS:

Omnis:  6xNevaton MCE400s, Countryman b3s (modded), MM HLSOs (4.7K mod), Aevox in ear MK2s, CA-11s
Cards:   Schoeps MK4s with Schoeps CMRS, Milab VM-44 Links, SP CMC-8,  AT853, Sennheiser MKE 104, MM HLSC-1s, ECM-717
Hypers: AKG CK93s (modded), SP CMC-8, AT853, Audix 1280s (Church actives).


INBETWEEN: Naiant Tinybox (CMR mod), Naiant Tinybox (p48 mod), Naiant PFA, CA-9100, CA Ugly, Denecke PS-2 mini, MM-MBM, MM-CBM, SP SPSB-8, custom nuetrik XLR to TRS cables, 5 pin to 5 pin extension cable. 

DECKS: A10, M10, R05, Tascam DR-05, R09-HR , MT2, Sharp MS-H702, MZ-R 70.

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: line in or mic in that is the question!
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2008, 12:56:04 PM »
Only experiment I did was to feed the same signal comparing the levels.  Line-in required 8dB more to match levels on the mic-in.
DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 34 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF