0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 10:49:33 PMpmonk is yours modified?!?
Quote from: paullySC on July 12, 2006, 11:01:22 PMQuote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 10:49:33 PMpmonk is yours modified?!?With a +4dB overload limit on the ACM I would be shocked to see any microphone recording overload the box. I think running the -20dB pad was for running the box at a higer level on the record wheel. If it's a simple variable resistor this makes sense as you would have less effect (coloration) of that circuit at the higer points on the wheel. I would simply test to see if there's any noise intorduced by the pad with a non-input if not I can understand the recommendation. I can't wait to get mine... I'm confused. Are there situations where you would want to run the pad so you can turn the record level up? I'm asking because I don't really understand. I was under the impression that you use the pad if you have to but if you don't need it don't use it. Can anyone clarify this for me?thanksPaul
Quote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 10:49:33 PMpmonk is yours modified?!?With a +4dB overload limit on the ACM I would be shocked to see any microphone recording overload the box. I think running the -20dB pad was for running the box at a higer level on the record wheel. If it's a simple variable resistor this makes sense as you would have less effect (coloration) of that circuit at the higer points on the wheel. I would simply test to see if there's any noise intorduced by the pad with a non-input if not I can understand the recommendation. I can't wait to get mine...
Quote from: pmonk66 on July 12, 2006, 11:13:16 PMQuote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 10:49:33 PMpmonk is yours modified?!?No - mine is stock. I have a pair of AT831. RHD was probably the loudest show I've been to in your. Rule of thumb is if your ears hurt during the show expect brickwalling!
Quote from: tfs8271 on July 12, 2006, 06:25:37 PMQuote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 04:45:35 PMI'm thinking a 2, a 4 and maybe one of these things....http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp?CatId=1203Anyone used one with success?? I've read that they won't do more than 4-6 gig on one charge but If I had an inverter It should be OK. My only concern is the larger file size.I have a 1 GB card and a 4 GB card. I did my first festival shows at HSMF and I used http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1335818&CatId=1203 and it works great but doesn't download fast enough (1 GB in ~13 minutes) from band to band (actually just fast enough with like five minutes to spare) so have to be ready as soon as the act is done and erase asap for the next act and yes I was only able to do ~5 GB before recharging. Luckily they had power at locations at High Sierra. Coffee in the morning and a recharge/download while showering.In the future I will go with this one, which downloads 1 GB in 2 minutes and uses standard AA battieres. They say ~50 GB download with one battiery charge. I will use my 20GB Inoi for taking files to work or to a friends house on road trips as you can move from your pc harddrive to the portable drive!!!!Here is my next purchase. ---------->>>> http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=52070.msg703550#msg703550edit: download rates and battiery charge times.
Quote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 04:45:35 PMI'm thinking a 2, a 4 and maybe one of these things....http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp?CatId=1203Anyone used one with success?? I've read that they won't do more than 4-6 gig on one charge but If I had an inverter It should be OK. My only concern is the larger file size.
Quote from: Ъ з ® Ğ on July 12, 2006, 11:32:44 PMFor a portable OTG drive, I recommend the Hyperdrive HD80. hands down!
Quote from: Jammin72 on July 12, 2006, 11:33:59 PMQuote from: Ъ з ® Ğ on July 12, 2006, 11:32:44 PMFor a portable OTG drive, I recommend the Hyperdrive HD80. hands down!Whoops... too late What Brand CF Cards are you using with success?
Quote from: dre on August 20, 2008, 01:33:40 PM4. im so abrasive i make sandpaper nervous.
Quote from: tfs8271 on July 13, 2006, 12:26:51 AMRun the pad (-20dB). I've got about twenty to thirty shows under the belt and even found at a Willie Nelson show (front row) that I ran the first set with pad and low levels (adjusted with SoundForge 7.0) sounds way better than the second set with no pad. I had to keep screwing with the levels with no pad and had some clipping. I recorded my last show WSP 7/8 (bt.etree) with the pad and contemplated running no pad after I was running the whole first set at max levels and was only getting -6 to -2dB on the meter. Glad I didn't because the end of the set and second set were close to if not at over levels and everything sounded great. I asked Doug awhile back about running the pad as apposed to running the pad on my km140s and he said don't bother with the mics and only run the 660 pad. I would think it might be advised to run the pad always. Of my first ten recordings I played with pad or no-pad and I had problems with clipping. After saying F-it and only running with pad I've never had a problem and at times I thought shit my levels are too high and adjusted down only to get home and think why the hell did I screw with it. If you download my WSP form etree listen to the last three songs. I had my recorder on peak only recording and I don't think my levels ever got below red (remember when you run peak only that it takes the highest level during each ~5 second interval) for those songs and I was certain that I would have clipping, but no clipping. If you are not running you levels at about 2 o'clock or 60-70% of the dial your not in the range. I've run SBD and run the pad with perfection at about 60-70% of dial. I usually tell the operator to adjust the levels to my levels at that setting. PLEASE LISTEN.......RUN THE PAD. Feedback is appreciated.
Quote from: Ъ з ® Ğ on July 13, 2006, 12:30:45 AMQuote from: tfs8271 on July 13, 2006, 12:26:51 AMRun the pad (-20dB). I've got about twenty to thirty shows under the belt and even found at a Willie Nelson show (front row) that I ran the first set with pad and low levels (adjusted with SoundForge 7.0) sounds way better than the second set with no pad. I had to keep screwing with the levels with no pad and had some clipping. I recorded my last show WSP 7/8 (bt.etree) with the pad and contemplated running no pad after I was running the whole first set at max levels and was only getting -6 to -2dB on the meter. Glad I didn't because the end of the set and second set were close to if not at over levels and everything sounded great. I asked Doug awhile back about running the pad as apposed to running the pad on my km140s and he said don't bother with the mics and only run the 660 pad. I would think it might be advised to run the pad always. Of my first ten recordings I played with pad or no-pad and I had problems with clipping. After saying F-it and only running with pad I've never had a problem and at times I thought shit my levels are too high and adjusted down only to get home and think why the hell did I screw with it. If you download my WSP form etree listen to the last three songs. I had my recorder on peak only recording and I don't think my levels ever got below red (remember when you run peak only that it takes the highest level during each ~5 second interval) for those songs and I was certain that I would have clipping, but no clipping. If you are not running you levels at about 2 o'clock or 60-70% of the dial your not in the range. I've run SBD and run the pad with perfection at about 60-70% of dial. I usually tell the operator to adjust the levels to my levels at that setting. PLEASE LISTEN.......RUN THE PAD. Feedback is appreciated.One thing to note here though is that you're running Neumann's which from my experience are WAY hotter than other mics such as AKG's... in your case, running the pad is probably more crucial. I will experiment with it more when my 660 arrives.
Quote from: raoulduke on July 13, 2006, 12:40:37 AMtrust me guys, if you own an acm660 you need to run the pad, ALWAYS. some of us acm671 users have found out the hard way that it's not a good thing to run without it. (.wav's look like sticks of butter) if you aren't getting enough gain on rock shows, you aren't close enough.also, the gain dial on the 660/671 is an attenuator so the closer you can get it to "10", the better it'll sound since you are getting "all of the mod" so to speak, and not the attenuation in the signal. I usually run my 671 ~8>9 and had it cranked this monday for ratcheese.
Quote from: paullySC on July 13, 2006, 06:28:19 AMQuote from: tfs8271 on July 13, 2006, 12:26:51 AMRun the pad (-20dB). I've got about twenty to thirty shows under the belt and even found at a Willie Nelson show (front row) that I ran the first set with pad and low levels (adjusted with SoundForge 7.0) sounds way better than the second set with no pad. I had to keep screwing with the levels with no pad and had some clipping. I recorded my last show WSP 7/8 (bt.etree) with the pad and contemplated running no pad after I was running the whole first set at max levels and was only getting -6 to -2dB on the meter. Glad I didn't because the end of the set and second set were close to if not at over levels and everything sounded great. I asked Doug awhile back about running the pad as apposed to running the pad on my km140s and he said don't bother with the mics and only run the 660 pad. I would think it might be advised to run the pad always. Of my first ten recordings I played with pad or no-pad and I had problems with clipping. After saying F-it and only running with pad I've never had a problem and at times I thought shit my levels are too high and adjusted down only to get home and think why the hell did I screw with it. If you download my WSP form etree listen to the last three songs. I had my recorder on peak only recording and I don't think my levels ever got below red (remember when you run peak only that it takes the highest level during each ~5 second interval) for those songs and I was certain that I would have clipping, but no clipping. If you are not running you levels at about 2 o'clock or 60-70% of the dial your not in the range. I've run SBD and run the pad with perfection at about 60-70% of dial. I usually tell the operator to adjust the levels to my levels at that setting. PLEASE LISTEN.......RUN THE PAD. Feedback is appreciated.Well I think I'll try the pad a a few more time and see what happens. I usually run my levels at -6 and once in a while they peak in the red. Where are you running your levels with the pad? In the red the whole time? Thanks for the info y'allpaulpaul