Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs  (Read 4961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline H₂O

  • (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5700
  • Gender: Male
Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« on: April 21, 2007, 10:05:19 PM »
Here are some pics of the internals of the M222 vs the CMC6xt.
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline Shawn

  • is old and tired
  • (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3250
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2007, 10:22:01 PM »
wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals

BobW

  • Guest
  • (0)
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2007, 10:42:00 PM »
wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals

Surprized?
One is tube and the other is FET
They are very different animals

Offline rowjimmy

  • (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2172
  • Gender: Male
  • rowjimmy.com
    • Row Knows
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2007, 09:42:38 AM »
Cool. thanks for the peek.
@rowj | Host of The Brokedown Podcast
Superlux SMK-H8K/H/U > KindKables Black Stealths > Busman T-Mod FR2LE

Offline Brian

  • (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2007, 10:25:25 AM »
look how much less "stuff" the electronic signal has to go through in the M222's

/tubes rule

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2007, 12:20:20 PM »
look how much less "stuff" the electronic signal has to go through in the M222's

Keep in mind there's all the "stuff" inside the NT222, as well.

Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline Brian

  • (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2007, 12:24:46 PM »
let's crack open one of those boxes and see how much "stuff" there is :D

Offline rokpunk

  • WOULD HIT IT
  • (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9262
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2007, 12:44:37 PM »
let's crack open one of those boxes and see how much "stuff" there is :D

i'm willing to bet there is more "stuff" in there than is in the cmc body.
The new and improved taperssection.com....now with freedom of speech without the repercussion of -T's!



again, your showing your cluelessness.


Jah sitteth in Mount Zion
And rules all creation........

Offline Brian

  • (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2007, 12:49:53 PM »
is it better "stuff" though ?

/clearly backtracking after early morning brain fart of forgetting n222 :P

/tubes still rule though

Roving Sign

  • Guest
  • (0)
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2007, 12:55:28 PM »
Why are the numbers blotted out?

Offline H₂O

  • (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5700
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2007, 01:23:43 PM »
Why are the numbers blotted out?

I didn't want to share my serial numbers with the world.
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline H₂O

  • (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5700
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2007, 01:26:28 PM »
One thing I am suprised about with the M222 is how little the electronics are between the 701 Tube and the capsules.
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline Shawn

  • is old and tired
  • (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3250
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2007, 09:32:54 PM »
wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals

Surprized?
One is tube and the other is FET
They are very different animals
certainly, but I expected to at least something similair considering they power the same caps. I am in no way an electronics expert (though I techincally minored in physics-electronics in college), but I figured the layouts would at least be similair. It appears as though they basically have no common components.

Offline BWolf

  • (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5957
  • Gender: Male
  • Always on the prowl...
    • Etree Trading List
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2007, 09:42:57 PM »
is the tube the device labeled 701?  or is it on the other side of the board?
"The best jazz is funky, and the best funk is jazzy" -SMOOTH
------------------------------------------------------
Neumann AK20/AK40s > LC3 > KM100 > Lunatec V3 (MS mod) > SD 722 or Microtrack 24/96  (Hi-Ho Silver Custom Interconnects)
------------------------------------------------------

Offline Tim

  • (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2007, 10:44:31 PM »
thanks richard
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2021 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF