Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R09HR  (Read 156851 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline any slash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #195 on: May 05, 2008, 05:46:07 AM »
instead of that dinky lil' stand i would be a lot more tempted if the in-box gunk included a crappy basic protective case or windshield

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #196 on: May 05, 2008, 11:03:17 PM »
For the curious, there is a show on DIME recorded with the new R-09HR's internal mics.

http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=195472

<< Note: This is a mono recording. >>

It certainly wouldn't be fair to judge the entire recorder by the use of the internal mics, but it is a nice first listen outside of Edirol's samples. I'm really surprised by the recording...in how bad it sounds! The acoustics in the venue are terrible, but there is a fair amount of hiss/noise in the quiet parts, and the entire recording sounds "shrill". Personally, I think the internals of the old Edirol R-09 would have done a much better job.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2008, 04:44:30 PM by Sunday Driver »
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

Offline Falconidave

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 406
  • Gender: Male
  • "I went to too many concerts" said no one ever!
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #197 on: May 06, 2008, 11:10:07 PM »
For the curious, there is a show on DIME recorded with the new R-09HR's internal mics. http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=195472
It certainly wouldn't be fair to judge the entire recorder by the use of the internal mics, but it is a nice first listen outside of Edirol's samples. I'm really surprised by the recording...in how bad it sounds! The acoustics in the venue are terrible, but there is a fair amount of hiss/noise in the quiet parts, and the entire recording sounds "shrill". Personally, I think the internals of the old Edirol R-09 would have done a much better job.

That's not really fair to judge or make a comparison to the old R-09 by this recording.  There is no mention of location in the venue or even bitrate/resolution.  It could even be MP3 based on the overall size of the show.  The uploader doesn't even know how to spell "lineage" for God's sake.  I'm certainly not going to give this POC recording any merit... 
Mics: Schoeps MK41; AT853(3-wire)(c,o); AT943(3-wire)(c,o); AT933(3-wire)(c,o); Shure 185(c); Sony ECM-166BMP (o); Sony ECM-166BC (c).
Interconnects: NBob Actives
Preamps: BabyNbox v2
Recorders: Sony PCM-A10(2); Sony PCM-M10; Edirol R-09HR; Sony MZ-RH1
Video: Panasonic HDC-TM700 HD; Panasonic Lumix GX85; Panasonic Lumix DMC ZS100; Canon PowerShot SX50 HD; Sony DSC-HX50V

Offline echo1434

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #198 on: May 06, 2008, 11:15:05 PM »
It could even be MP3 based on the overall size of the show.  The uploader doesn't even know how to spell "lineage" for God's sake.  I'm certainly not going to give this POC recording any merit... 

MP3 based stuff doesn't really compress any differently that lossless stuff when put to FLAC (although it's a stupid thing to do, of course).

The size of this show is probably related to low levels and/or being in mono.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2008, 11:17:20 PM by echo1434 »

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #199 on: May 07, 2008, 12:03:13 AM »
For the curious, there is a show on DIME recorded with the new R-09HR's internal mics. http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=195472
It certainly wouldn't be fair to judge the entire recorder by the use of the internal mics, but it is a nice first listen outside of Edirol's samples. I'm really surprised by the recording...in how bad it sounds! The acoustics in the venue are terrible, but there is a fair amount of hiss/noise in the quiet parts, and the entire recording sounds "shrill". Personally, I think the internals of the old Edirol R-09 would have done a much better job.

That's not really fair to judge or make a comparison to the old R-09 by this recording.  There is no mention of location in the venue or even bitrate/resolution.  It could even be MP3 based on the overall size of the show.  The uploader doesn't even know how to spell "lineage" for God's sake.  I'm certainly not going to give this POC recording any merit... 

Yea, piece of crap recording...I agree. I guess samples are going to vary widely. It's the first concert that I have seen taped with the new Edirol R-09HR though.
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

dorrcoq

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #200 on: May 07, 2008, 04:11:36 PM »

Yea, piece of crap recording...I agree.

HMMMMM  According to the seeder - "Very good sounding audience recording..." ;D

Offline powermonkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1061
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #201 on: May 07, 2008, 04:42:50 PM »
For the curious, there is a show on DIME recorded with the new R-09HR's internal mics. http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=195472
It certainly wouldn't be fair to judge the entire recorder by the use of the internal mics, but it is a nice first listen outside of Edirol's samples. I'm really surprised by the recording...in how bad it sounds! The acoustics in the venue are terrible, but there is a fair amount of hiss/noise in the quiet parts, and the entire recording sounds "shrill". Personally, I think the internals of the old Edirol R-09 would have done a much better job.

That's not really fair to judge or make a comparison to the old R-09 by this recording.  There is no mention of location in the venue or even bitrate/resolution.  It could even be MP3 based on the overall size of the show.  The uploader doesn't even know how to spell "lineage" for God's sake.  I'm certainly not going to give this POC recording any merit... 

Yea, piece of crap recording...I agree. I guess samples are going to vary widely. It's the first concert that I have seen taped with the new Edirol R-09HR though.
I taped my mates, a band called Nebraska, with my R09HR. 320k mp3s but it might help I suppose. Didn't use the internal mics, though, went CA-11 > FEL pre > R09HR

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=A6BZSHTE
Church Audio CA-11s, CA-14 Cards, CA-14 Omnis, Peluso CEMC-6

CA 9200 preamp
FEL BMA-1 Preamp



Edirol R09
Edirol R09HR
Sony M10
Edirol R44

My live recordings.... HERE:

https://www.facebook.com/Liverecordings1

and/or

https://soundcloud.com/liverecordings-1

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #202 on: May 07, 2008, 07:36:38 PM »
For the curious, there is a show on DIME recorded with the new R-09HR's internal mics. http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=195472
It certainly wouldn't be fair to judge the entire recorder by the use of the internal mics, but it is a nice first listen outside of Edirol's samples. I'm really surprised by the recording...in how bad it sounds! The acoustics in the venue are terrible, but there is a fair amount of hiss/noise in the quiet parts, and the entire recording sounds "shrill". Personally, I think the internals of the old Edirol R-09 would have done a much better job.

That's not really fair to judge or make a comparison to the old R-09 by this recording.  There is no mention of location in the venue or even bitrate/resolution.  It could even be MP3 based on the overall size of the show.  The uploader doesn't even know how to spell "lineage" for God's sake.  I'm certainly not going to give this POC recording any merit... 

Yea, piece of crap recording...I agree. I guess samples are going to vary widely. It's the first concert that I have seen taped with the new Edirol R-09HR though.
I taped my mates, a band called Nebraska, with my R09HR. 320k mp3s but it might help I suppose. Didn't use the internal mics, though, went CA-11 > FEL pre > R09HR

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=A6BZSHTE


Thank you for sharing that. 10 times more accurate "samples". The music is good too.  :P
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

Offline polewka

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 179
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #203 on: May 12, 2008, 01:01:08 PM »
Taped Ladytron with my HR, but funked it right up. Set the rec level to 18, and used 96 setting on the BB.

Then went and plonked myself too close, which means a lovely first timer brick walled recording. last time I did that was on cassette in 1995. About 30 feet from the right stack (engrained in me from 10 years plus of MD recording). That said I've heard a couple of reports of real unhealthy sounds on their current tour. Way saturated with bass, and not good sound in general. They also ramped up the sound by 30% or so for the encore.

So, was annoyed, but the R-09HR is a lovely little unit, and easy to use stealthily with the settings set up to drop the flashing red LED's after 10 secs of flipping the hold switch.

Next up, Einsturzende Neubauten. Gonna be bugging the guys on the Mixer at that one. (meaning am right in front of it, not asking for a patch - I'm NEVER that lucky).

Anyone care to share tips for avaoiding brickwalls would be much appreciated. Is the Edirol very sensitive to this, I guess it has a lot more to do with the mics + bb set up though ?
« Last Edit: May 12, 2008, 01:09:17 PM by polewka »
Mics: AT853's (Cards), CA-14's (Cards)
Battery Boxes: SP-SPSB-6, SP-SPSB-10
Recorders: Edirol R-09HR, Sony PCM-M10
Camera: Panasonic Lumix TZ-7

Offline jamroom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 931
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #204 on: May 12, 2008, 01:15:14 PM »
Sorry to hear of your troubles. Did you not check the levels when the band started? Essential - I usually check a couple of times during the first couple of songs. Better running it quieter where you can boost in post, if needs be.

Regarding the RED LIGHT - the R09 has a setting where it goes off after two seconds, I would have presumed the HR would be the same?

Good luck with Einsturzende Neubauten - that should be interesting!

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #205 on: May 12, 2008, 02:39:55 PM »
polewka, what mics were you using? One thing that I did notice on the new R-09HR is that they raised the impedance on the mic jack slightly, and lowered it on the line input. I purchased one that should get here by the end of the month. Really want to run some tests for sensitivity, noise, etc...
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

Offline polewka

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 179
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #206 on: May 12, 2008, 05:50:43 PM »
AT943's - levels were not peaking - I set at 18 after some good advice from a quality taper. No levels saturated on the display (I check frequently).

95 on the BB, still think it was cause I was too damn close.
Mics: AT853's (Cards), CA-14's (Cards)
Battery Boxes: SP-SPSB-6, SP-SPSB-10
Recorders: Edirol R-09HR, Sony PCM-M10
Camera: Panasonic Lumix TZ-7

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #207 on: May 12, 2008, 07:52:31 PM »
Ah, I used to use the same mics with a battery box, and got distortion running line in on the old R-09. Running mic in with no battery box seemed to fix the problem, although increased the noise floor a bit. (mic gain always on low on the unit itself)
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #208 on: May 12, 2008, 11:56:18 PM »
For the curious, there is a show on DIME recorded with the new R-09HR's internal mics. http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=195472
It certainly wouldn't be fair to judge the entire recorder by the use of the internal mics, but it is a nice first listen outside of Edirol's samples. I'm really surprised by the recording...in how bad it sounds! The acoustics in the venue are terrible, but there is a fair amount of hiss/noise in the quiet parts, and the entire recording sounds "shrill". Personally, I think the internals of the old Edirol R-09 would have done a much better job.

That's not really fair to judge or make a comparison to the old R-09 by this recording.  There is no mention of location in the venue or even bitrate/resolution.  It could even be MP3 based on the overall size of the show.  The uploader doesn't even know how to spell "lineage" for God's sake.  I'm certainly not going to give this POC recording any merit... 

Yea, piece of crap recording...I agree. I guess samples are going to vary widely. It's the first concert that I have seen taped with the new Edirol R-09HR though.
I taped my mates, a band called Nebraska, with my R09HR. 320k mp3s but it might help I suppose. Didn't use the internal mics, though, went CA-11 > FEL pre > R09HR

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=A6BZSHTE


Man, I'd love to hear to those samples, but all I get from Megaupload is this kind message (all the time!!!):

"All download slots assigned to your country are currently in use. Please try again in a few hours or install the Megaupload Toolbar for immediate access - with the toolbar installed, there are no more slot limitations for you!" 
 ::) ::) ::)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Edirol R09HR
« Reply #209 on: May 13, 2008, 07:06:08 AM »
AT943's - levels were not peaking - I set at 18 after some good advice from a quality taper. No levels saturated on the display (I check frequently).

95 on the BB, still think it was cause I was too damn close.

Can't you depend upon the R-09 LED display to see if you're brickwalling?  If not, then what good is it?  As a soon-to-be owner of a R-09HR I find this very distressing.  How do you set your levels if you can't depend upon the LED display?  I do NOT have an R-09 nor have I ever used one...yet.

hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF