Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: New M-Audio Recorder  (Read 101469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Todd R

  • Over/Under on next gear purchase: 2 months
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4902
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #135 on: May 03, 2005, 12:19:05 PM »
<GRACE FLUFF ON>...maybe they should take a page from Grace....how many times you heard of a bad bug with their equipment, maybe short of a batter light blinking when it shouldn't, and that was purely a calibration problem...easily fixed.

The first 35 were shipped out with a DC offset problem...



Good lord, do we really need one more thread with the ongoing 722 vs V3 war?  ::)   This has gotten way old.
Mics: Microtech Gefell m20/m21 (nbob/pfa actives), Line Audio CM3, Church CA-11 cards
Preamp:  none <sniff>
Recorders:  Sound Devices MixPre-6, Sony PCM-M10, Zoom H4nPro

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #136 on: May 03, 2005, 12:19:16 PM »
Chris Imburgia (aka Junior aka Focker) is currently running some sort of Ipaq setup.  I believe he can reliably record up to 24/88.2 but cannot record 24/96 without errors.  this is next to useless for spreading the files because apparently flac cannot deal with 88.2 khz files so they have to be resampled to be spread around.

Offline scb

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8732
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #137 on: May 03, 2005, 12:37:13 PM »
<GRACE FLUFF ON>...maybe they should take a page from Grace....how many times you heard of a bad bug with their equipment, maybe short of a batter light blinking when it shouldn't, and that was purely a calibration problem...easily fixed.

The first 35 were shipped out with a DC offset problem...



Good lord, do we really need one more thread with the ongoing 722 vs V3 war?  ::)   This has gotten way old.

i don't hate the v3 at all.  i still own one and like it a lot.  i just also happen to like the 722 a lot :)

sue me!

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #138 on: May 03, 2005, 12:39:11 PM »
A requirement for any approach, including the Flash Tracker, is a great analog/AD section.

why?
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline nickgregory

  • Admitted Jeter Homer
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 22376
  • Gender: Male
    • Hurricanes Insider
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #139 on: May 03, 2005, 12:39:20 PM »
Anyone have any idea when the feature set of the Flash Tracker will be CONFIRMED?

or the price

Offline Todd R

  • Over/Under on next gear purchase: 2 months
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4902
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #140 on: May 03, 2005, 12:49:17 PM »
A requirement for any approach, including the Flash Tracker, is a great analog/AD section.

why?

Yep, I'm with Tim here.  I'll keep beating my drum -- I want a 24-bit D8 replacement using solid state or HD.  The D8 did not have a great analog/AD section by any means.  It was used for lower end recordings as a standalone, a patch deck, and a digital input device from people using high end pres and A/Ds.  And because of this, it had a very low price, all things considered.  Start getting into a great analog/AD section, and you start getting pricing like a PortaDAT or a 722.  The JB3 has a pretty crappy analog/AD section, and I've used it happily for 2 1/2 years.
Mics: Microtech Gefell m20/m21 (nbob/pfa actives), Line Audio CM3, Church CA-11 cards
Preamp:  none <sniff>
Recorders:  Sound Devices MixPre-6, Sony PCM-M10, Zoom H4nPro

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #141 on: May 03, 2005, 12:50:35 PM »
Is the Sound Devices 722/744 really anything more than a very well packaged Linux computer with a very good audio section and LCD?

Based on what I can tell about the unit, the "OS" is written in assembly.
Out of the game … for now?

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #142 on: May 03, 2005, 01:08:25 PM »
gotcha
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline silentmark

  • Shine with or without cherries ?
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2685
  • Gender: Male
  • Boat, cucumber, wire ...
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #143 on: May 03, 2005, 01:26:06 PM »
Craig T runs this with an external hard drive at 24 bit and has no problems as far as I know ...


Maybe Craig will chime in with his experiences.  But from what I remember, he is now able to run 24/48 reliably, but can't do 24/96 reliably.  And from what he said, this took a lot of testing and configuring and time and new recording s/w, etc, etc, to get to work.  Maybe the deal is that now the PDAudio works like a charm right out of the box and it was only the initial releases and initial recording s/w that had problems.  But whatever, I've long ago soured on the PDAudio and to me it just is not a D8 replacement, it's laptop recording on a smaller scale.  I'm still hoping the flash tracker or some similar product will be out soon that will be much more like a D8 for 24 bits, at least as far as my needs go.

I thought he got it to work at 24/96 with the external HD ? I could be wrong though ...

Regardless I am with ya on the hope something comes out ala the D8, only time will tell ...
Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. - Howard Zinn, not Thomas Jefferson ...

Mics: Neumann AK50/AK40/AK30/AK20(1 for M/S), AKG568eb's (gathering dust)
Decks: R-44 (OCM), Fostex FR2LE (OWM), Microtacker (semi-retired), D8 (retired), D7 (retired)
Pre-amps: Apogee Minime (semi-retired), Sonosax SX-M2 (semi-retired), Oade mod SBM-1 (retired)
Cables: LC3 actives (older lemo style x2), Audio Magic Hyper Conductor interconnects

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3qrWOOposQ

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #144 on: May 03, 2005, 02:02:12 PM »
Is the Sound Devices 722/744 really anything more than a very well packaged Linux computer with a very good audio section and LCD?

Based on what I can tell about the unit, the "OS" is written in assembly.

I think his analysis of the 722/744 is an over simplification too.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #145 on: May 03, 2005, 02:55:40 PM »
<GRACE FLUFF ON>... always works....</GRACE FLUFF OFF> ;D

From the 316 to the V2 to the V3, Mike Grace and his crew put us on the reliable bleeding edge.

It was always my understanding about the FireWire mod that it was more of a licencing issue than it was a technological resources problem? 


Back to the Maudio recorder, why couldn't we (ts.com) as a group try to put a compact list of features that we'd like at a realistic price point and see if one of these vendors (Maudio, SD, etc.) could produce it? 

Tried that bud. Noone bit. ASked here, for input, actually, then took that list to a sound engineer bud, and we sent it to some companies after he complied in tech speak. Still haint heard back.

Ray
« Last Edit: May 03, 2005, 02:59:28 PM by BigRay »

Online Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4353
    • LMA
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #146 on: May 03, 2005, 03:54:26 PM »
I went through about 2 years of headaches with the PDAudio rig, but now it is rock solid at 24/96 writing to an external HD containing a 7200 rpm 40GB drive.  I never tried recording to CF or SD media, but it was unreliable even at 24/48 writing to a 5GB pcmcia drive.  You should also know I'm using an "ancient" iPaq 3835 (<$100 on ebay now) - the newer ones have more powerful processors and that could make a difference with recording performance.

Craig T runs this with an external hard drive at 24 bit and has no problems as far as I know ...


Maybe Craig will chime in with his experiences.  But from what I remember, he is now able to run 24/48 reliably, but can't do 24/96 reliably.  And from what he said, this took a lot of testing and configuring and time and new recording s/w, etc, etc, to get to work.  Maybe the deal is that now the PDAudio works like a charm right out of the box and it was only the initial releases and initial recording s/w that had problems.  But whatever, I've long ago soured on the PDAudio and to me it just is not a D8 replacement, it's laptop recording on a smaller scale.  I'm still hoping the flash tracker or some similar product will be out soon that will be much more like a D8 for 24 bits, at least as far as my needs go.
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

Offline Todd R

  • Over/Under on next gear purchase: 2 months
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4902
  • Gender: Male
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #147 on: May 03, 2005, 04:40:55 PM »
Thanks for your inputs on this, Craig.  Good to know it can reliably do 24/96 now.  Still, I have no confidence this is the type of set up for dinosaurs like me who just want to plug in a cable and press record.  Probably a great option for people who understand all the workings of the OS and whatnot, or for those who want to learn.  But I'd guess that for people like me who don't have the knowledge, patience, or stamina to get a soundcard working right, it is probably isn't the best bet to go with one of the PDAudio dealies.
Mics: Microtech Gefell m20/m21 (nbob/pfa actives), Line Audio CM3, Church CA-11 cards
Preamp:  none <sniff>
Recorders:  Sound Devices MixPre-6, Sony PCM-M10, Zoom H4nPro

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #148 on: May 08, 2005, 10:25:32 AM »
Besides reliable 24/96 and some metering we need bit perfect WAV splits at 2GB or less. Also a pre-roll buffer would be nice.
Did I mention a remote? (like the Sony D-x/xxx decks had)
Will it have one input with the 5V? Or two?
Details are welcome since M-Audio support doesn't know nothing.

Offline John Kelly

  • Been a while...
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9753
  • Gender: Male
    • The Jokell
Re: New M-Audio Recorder
« Reply #149 on: May 08, 2005, 10:28:24 AM »
Quote
Besides reliable 24/96 and some metering we need bit perfect WAV splits at 2GB or less

Or recording in a format that supports files larger than 2gb.  Wav64 or SDII extended would be great. ;D
Sennheiser MKH8040st > SD 702
XBL/PSN/Steam ID: thejokell

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF